Home > Cases > RHJ v Patten


RHJ v Patten

[2008] EWCA Civ 151

Court: Court of Appeal
Date of Judgment: 12.03.08
Andrew Francis

The Court of Appeal held that a term in a lease could be a 'consent' within section 3 of the Prescription Act 1932 without expressly referring to light.  Accordingly, no easement of light could be acquired by the claimant's building by prescription.

Andrew Francis successfully appeared before the Court of Appeal on behalf of the Respondents.

About cookies on our website

This site uses cookies to enhance and improve your experience when browsing. To find out more about the way we use cookies please see our Privacy Policy.