"impressive silks and juniors are praised for their strength in depth"
Serle Court “offers a variety of skill sets that others can’t provide, and houses some of the biggest names at the Bar”
Area of Law: Adrian de Froment
Judgment has been handed down in D.W. Windsor Limited v Urbis Schreder Ltd [2025] EWHC 563 (IPEC), a patents dispute, following a 2-day trial in the IPEC on 17 and 18 December 2024.
Read MoreArea of Law: Adrian de Froment
Judgment has been handed down in Bionome v Clearwater [2024] EWHC 3155 (Ch), an interesting High Court appeal concerning intellectual property and trusts. The judgment of Tom Mitcheson KC addresses issues including the patent entitlement, the proper construction of an alleged assignment and whether a trust had been validly declared by conduct. The case is also a rare example of a successful application to adduce fresh evidence on appeal under CPR r. 52.21(2), applying the Ladd v Marshall criteria.
Read MoreArea of Law: Adrian de Froment
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has handed down its advice in Jean-Charles v The Attorney General of The Bahamas and ors [2022] UKPC 51. The decision establishes that a constitutional challenge may be made in an action for habeas corpus and that separate legal proceedings are not required.
Read MoreArea of Law: Adrian de Froment
On 10 January 2022, Mr Justice Henshaw handed down judgment in Barclays Bank Plc v Shetty [2022] EWHC 19 (Comm) which is of interest to litigators facing adjournment applications and those seeking to enforce foreign judgments in England at common law.
Read MoreArea of Law: Adrian de Froment
Jonathan Harris QC (Hon.) and Adrian de Froment appeared in the trial of the governing law of an agency contract to distribute poultry equipment in North America.
Read MoreArea of Law: Adrian de Froment
Prof Jonathan Harris QC (Hon.) & Adrian de Froment instructed by the successful Defendant in trial of a preliminary issue as to the governing law of an agency contract to distribute poultry equipment in North America.
Read MoreArea of Law: Adrian de Froment
Adrian de Froment acted for the successful defendants in INVISTA v Botes and ors ([2019] EWHC 58 (Ch)), a dispute involving allegations that biotechnology research scientists formerly employed by the claimant had acted in breach of confidence and of pre- and post-termination employment covenants, and that they had procured breaches of contract by a third party. This was also one of the rare cases in which a Part 36 offer was found not to have been a genuine offer to settle and it would therefore have been unjust to enforce the costs consequences in CPR 36.17 ([2019] EWHC 1086 (Ch)).
Read More
