Glenea Contracts v Friel [2024] EWHC 1243 (Ch).  Max was sole counsel for the successful claimant in this three-day trial. The Court found that a senior manager had wrongfully overpaid himself from the claimant company’s bank account and was a fiduciary and trustee for the Company, and that he had misused the Company’s confidential information.   Max obtained judgment for the Claimant in the region of £1 million (inclusive of interest and costs.)

Ras Al-Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima and others. This counterclaim involving allegations of fraud, perjury and computer hacking, part of a long-running multi-jurisdictional litigation, settled shortly before a ten-week trial listed to be heard by Mr Justice Michael Green in 2024. Max acted for the Fourth Additional Defendant, led by Antony White KC and Ben Silverstone.

Gilbert v Broadoak Private Finance [2024] 6 WLUK 771; [2024] EWHC 2046 (Comm). Max is lead counsel for the successful Claimants, obtaining a c. £4 million judgment after a two-day trial before Andrew Hochhauser KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in 2025. He obtained worldwide freezing Orders against the Defendant company and pursuant to the Court's Chabra jurisdiction, its human alter ego and his wife. Substantial asset recoveries have been made and enforcement continues in multiple jurisdictions. Leading Ryan Tang.

Gela Mikadze v Dechert LLP and others. Acted for the Fourth Defendant in this litigation involving claims under English, Georgian and UAE law arising from allegations of conspiracy, improper interference with the judicial process and computer hacking. Max was part of a multi-chambers counsel team led by Antony White KC and Ben Silverstone.

St George’s BK Ltd v Parvez and others.  Max is sole counsel for the Claimant financial institution in this ongoing > £1 million High Court litigation against the producers of a British horror film in respect of fraudulently obtained film financing.    In 2022, Max successfully represented the Claimant in an application for a proprietary injunction, appearing as sole counsel before Mr Justice Adam Johnson and obtaining courtroom undertakings from a Defendant to preserve a film tax credit.

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v IGE USA Investments Limited . Max acted for HMRC in its $1 billion fraud claim against US multinational conglomerate General Electric. Max appeared for HMRC in the Court of Appeal and worked on HMRC’s successful application for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court (drawing on his experience as a former Supreme Court Judicial Assistant) and response to TaxWatch’s application to intervene in the Supreme Court. The case settled soon after the Supreme Court granted permission Led by Philip Jones KC, Gareth Tilley and Barbara Belgrano.

Re Klimvest plc [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch).  Acted for the successful petitioner in this two-week High Court trial of a just and equitable winding up petition in respect of a listed plc, in which the High Court made findings of dishonesty against the main witnesses for the First Respondent, including a finding that the company chairman had called another witness to give false evidence and colluded with him to circumvent Rule 9 of the Takeover Code.  The case also raised complex issues of company law involving loss of substratum and the question of whether equitable considerations can arise in listed public companies.  Led by Daniel Lightman KC at trial; appeared as sole counsel at the interlocutory stage.

Representing a director and minority shareholder in a just and equitable winding up petition involving allegations of fraud, breach of duty and misappropriation of corporate assets worth £ millions.  Led by Stephen Brown. 

Nigel Rowe & Others v Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Others (“the Ingenious Litigation”). Acted for numerous investors, from former Premier League footballers to leading financiers, in the film production partnerships behind blockbuster films such as Avatar and Life of Pi, bringing, inter alia, misrepresentation claims against the promoters of those partnerships. Led by a multi-chambers counsel team.

Serious Fraud Office and others v Litigation Capital Limited and others. Acted for the Serious Fraud Office in these complex multi-jurisdictional asset recovery proceedings ensuing from the affairs of the businessman, Dr Gerald Smith. Led by Kennedy Talbot KC.

Advising a group of investors on potential claims for conspiracy and fraudulent misrepresentation against various domestic and overseas defendants.

Max has worked on a broad spectrum of corporate disputes both at the Bar and in his past career and holds an LLM degree specialised in company law.  He is a contributor to Practical Law Corporate’s “Questions for Counsel”.

Recent work:

Re Klimvest plc [2023] 1 BCLC 388. Max represented the successful petitioner in this new landmark company law case, notable as the first example of a public listed company being wound up on the just and equitable ground under s 122(1)(g) Insolvency Act 1986 for loss of substratum, as well as for its commentary that a public listed company can, in principle, be a quasi-partnership – a company in which equitable considerations arise. The decision provides a comprehensive new legal framework for identifying a company’s purpose or substratum (as distinct from its stated ‘objects’ or ‘powers’) and determining whether it has been lost, justifying a winding-up.  As well as being led by Daniel Lightman KC in the two-week High Court trial of the Petition, Max was instructed to appear as sole counsel at interlocutory hearings. 

Duneau v Klimt Invest SA and Others  [2022] Costs LR 1463, in which the High Court considered the jurisdiction to award costs in favour of the company subject to a just and equitable winding up petition. Max represented the successful petitioner, led by Daniel Lightman KC.

Ntzegkoutanis v Kimionis (Re Coinomi Ltd) [2022] EWHC Civ 3178 (Ch).  Acted for the Petitioner in the High Court in a joint venture dispute concerning the ownership of a cryptocurrency wallet business and alleging misappropriation to offshore companies of valuable cryptocurrency assets. The case raised important issues as to the relationship between an unfair prejudice petition and a derivative claim, and the Court of Appeal ultimately upheld the Petitioner’s arguments.  Led by James Mather.

Re Inter Global Surgical LLP [2021] EWHC 2685 (Ch). Acted for the successful applicants, before Fancourt J, for a interim receivership order in respect of an LLP.  The application raised a novel legal issue  (whether a dissolved company that was a member of an LLP prior to dissolution is automatically reinstated as a member on restoration) and a procedural one (the appropriate court for issuing a Part 8 restoration claim).  Led by James Mather.

Advising a director and minority shareholder in an alternative lending company on a contemplated petition under s 994 Companies Act 2006 (unfair prejudice) and associated interim relief.

Advising a minority shareholder in a property development company on contemplated proceedings under s 994 Companies Act 2006 (with Matthew Morrison).

Kennedy v The Official Receiver [2022] BPIR 1536, [2022] EWHC 1973 (Ch).  Max was sole counsel for the successful appellant in this appeal against the length of a Bankruptcy Restrictions Order (“BRO”).  In a reserved judgment following a one-day appeal hearing, the High Court clarified the legal principles that apply to determining the length of a BRO, accepting Max’s argument that the Court should have regard to the facts of similar cases when determining the tariff of a Bankruptcy Restrictions Order.

Represented the successful respondent to an application for suspension of discharge from bankruptcy in the context of a transatlantic dispute relating to assets worth US$ several million.

Sole counsel for the respondents to an application under s. 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (transactions defrauding creditors) in respect of an overseas asset allegedly worth over $10 million.

Advising a major creditor of an insolvent utility company on issues of statutory interpretation and unjust enrichment arising from proofs of debt in excess of £20 million (led by Philip Jones KC).

Appeared as sole counsel in the High Court for the respondent to a bankruptcy petition in relation to a c. £2 million estate, securing a substantial adjournment on the basis that the alleged creditor had failed to disclose its security.

Advising the trustees in bankruptcy of a high net worth individual on co-ownership issues relating to the bankrupt’s matrimonial home (led by James Mather).

Acting as sole counsel for a specialist lender and secured creditor in proceedings relating to the bankruptcy of an individual borrower, involving issues of equitable security and proprietary estoppel, with recovery sought in excess of £1m.

Re Keeping Kids Company (in Liquidation). Assisted Gareth Tilley in these disqualification proceedings brought by the Official Receiver against the directors of the insolvent Kids Company charity.

Max has worked on a variety of complex domestic and international commercial disputes. He is equally comfortable being led as a junior in large-scale litigation and acting as sole counsel in mid-sized disputes. Recent cases include:

Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust v ESMS Global Limited [2022] EWHC 2941 (Comm).  Acting for the claimants in this Commercial Court litigation concerning employee share participation in a pharmaceutical business originally spun-off from the claimant NHS trust. The case is listed for a two-week trial in the Commercial Court in 2026. Max also appeared as a junior counsel in an early application hearing before Julia Dias KC (sitting as Deputy High Court Judge) led by Patrick Talbot KC and Zahler Bryan.

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v IGE USA Investments Limited. Acted for the Revenue in this $1 billion claim against US multinational conglomerate General Electric. Led by Gareth Tilley and Philip Jones KC.

Gilbert v Broadoak Private Finance [2024] 6 WLUK 771; [2024] EWHC 2046 (Comm).  Max lead counsel for the successful Claimants, obtaining a c. £ 4 million judgment after a two-day trial before Andrew Hochhauser KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in 2025. He obtained worldwide freezing Orders against the Defendant company and pursuant to the Court's Chabra jurisdiction, its human alter ego and his wife. Substantial asset recoveries have been made and enforcement continues in mulitple jurisdictions. Leading Ryan Tang.

Bayleaf Facilities Management v Waterstones Booksellers.  Sole counsel for the Claimant in proceedings brought by a supplier of this national retail chain for recovery of fees arising in the period of the Covid-19 pandemic.  Max appeared in a four-day trial in the Central London County Court in August 2023, in which the Claimant obtained a money judgment.

Nigel Rowe & Others v Ingenious Media Holdings plc & Others (“the Ingenious Litigation”). Acted for numerous investors, from former Premier League footballers to leading financiers, in the film production partnerships behind blockbuster films such as Avatar and Life of Pi, bringing, inter alia, misrepresentation claims against the promoters of those partnerships. Led by a multi-chambers counsel team.

Supreme Court Appeal. Instructed to advise ad hoc on a recent appeal to the Supreme Court, drawing on Max’s experience as a former Supreme Court Judicial Assistant.

Maryland Investment Corporation and another v Collins Benson Goldhill LLP and others. Acted for the claimants in this claim for the delivery up of documents against their former solicitors under s 68 of the Solicitors Act 1974 and the inherent jurisdiction. Led by Lance Ashworth KC and Matthew Morrison.

Successfully represented a firm of solicitors in a claim against a celebrity client for unpaid fees, resisting the Defendant’s application to set aside default judgment.

Re Fundão Dam Disaster [2020] EWHC 2930 (TCC). Assisted Jonathan McDonagh and Nicholas Harrison with an 8-day jurisdiction hearing in the High Court on behalf of 200,000+ victims of Brazil’s Fundão Dam disaster in this £5 billion group action against the world's largest mining company.

Max is developing a practice in the Middle East, focusing on the DIFC and ADGM.  He is a registered Part II Practitioner before the DIFC Courts. Recent work includes:

Representing the judgment creditor of a DIFC-LCIA arbitral award in an application by the debtor to set aside the award on the ground that the arbitration agreement was rendered invalid by the transfer of cases from the DIFC-LCIA arbitration centre to DIAC under Decree No. 34 of 2021.  Led by Rupert Reed KC.

China State Construction Engineering Corporation (Middle East) LLC v Zaya Living Real Estate Development LLC [2023] DIFC ENF 316 (10 July 2024) (on appeal from [2023] DIFC ENF 316 (17 May 2024)).  Max appeared for the successful appellant in this appeal concerning the power to order an "officer" of a corporate judgment debtor to attend Court for questioning under RDC 50.2(2) and the interpretation of the term “officer” in that provision.  Led by Rupert Reed KC.

Muhallam v Muhaf [2022] DIFC ARB 21. Max represented the Defendant to these complex, high-value DIFC proceedings seeking the enforcement of a US $91 million Arbitral Award.  Earlier decisions in the proceedings resolved an outstanding legal debate among practitioners as to whether interim arbitral awards of non-DIFC seated arbitrations are enforceable in the DIFC.  Following the Court’s confirmation that such awards were indeed enforceable, Max appeared as sole counsel for the Defendant at what appears to have been the first committal (contempt) application hearing before H.E. Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi (Muhallam v Muhaf [2022] DIFC ARB 21 (28 August 2024)) under the newly-clarified rules.  He also appeared as sole counsel at an application to vary an Order before H.E. Deputy Chief Justice Ali Al Madhani ([2022] DIFC ARB 21 (13 June 2024)).

A v B [2023] DIFC CFI 60.  Max represented the Claimants in this two-week complex trial before Justice Rene Le Miere, of a £9m claim raising allegations of unlawful conspiracy and widespread document deletion, the first time the hotly-debated legal issue of whether knowledge of unlawfulness is a necessary element in the tort of unlawful conspiracy (Article 36 of the DIFC Law of Obligations) has come before the DIFC Courts for consideration following recent English and ADGM decisions on the issue.  Led by Rupert Reed KC

X v Y [2023] DIFC ENF 269.  Max was instructed by the Respondents to these proceedings for enforcement of an AED 73 million arbitral award, brought by a major multinational construction corporation.  The underlying facts were complex, arising from a dispute spanning three different arbitrations over six years, but the legal significance related to the conflict of authority between the UK’s highest court (Masri v Consolidated Contractors (No. 4) [2010] 1 AC 90) and those of Singapore and the ADGM on whether an examination order may be made against the officer of a corporate judgment debtor who is outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Court.  In a fully reasoned judgment on the Respondents’ applications for permission to appeal, Chief Justice Wayne Martin granted permission to appeal to the First Respondent.  Led by Rupert Reed KC.

Re Inter Global Surgical LLP [2021] EWHC 2685 (Ch). Acted for the successful applicants, before Fancourt J, for a interim receivership order in respect of an LLP. The application raised the novel legal issue of whether a dissolved company that was a member of an LLP prior to dissolution is automatically reinstated as a member on restoration.  Led by James Mather.

Advising HMRC on the partnership law aspects of an artificial sale of a partnership to a limited company. 

Advising a sustainable investment fund on internal governance including in relation to bad leaver provisions. Led by James Mather.

Advising the AIFM of a fund worth >£500m on the effect of conflict-avoidance rules in its LLP agreement.  Led by James Mather.

Max is a contributing author to “The Law of Limited Liability Partnerships”