David Blayney KC


Call: 1992 Silk: 2013

“One of the cleverest people you could hope to meet. He gets down into the tiniest details of a case and has a fantastic strategic overview.”

Chambers & Partners 2019

David Blayney KC has a commercial and chancery practice with a particular focus on disputes involving complex financial or quantum issues.

Major cases in which David has been involved include the litigation arising out of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the test case on the fairness of bank charges and the group litigation relating to RBS’s £12bn rights issue in 2008.

David is also closely involved in the development of technology to support the analysis and preparation of complex cases, and is therefore well placed to help the team implement technology-enabled approaches to investigation and case preparation in appropriate matters.

Areas of Expertise

Recent Cases

  • Pagden v Fry (including summary judgment/strike-out hearing at [2025] EWHC 1918 (Ch)) – Claim for damages against a private equity fund manager relating to the sale of a portfolio of companies.
  • The RBS Rights Issue Litigation – Group litigation seeking damages arising out of RBS’s £12bn rights issue during the 2008 financial crisis.
  • Constantin Medien v Ecclestone & Others – Claim for damages relating to an alleged $44m bribe paid by Bernie Ecclestone and his family trust upon the sale of commercial rights in Formula One. (Instructed by Peters and Peters.)
  • Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) [2011] EWHC 2022 – Proceedings relating to the validity and effect of liens in Master Custody Agreements and Standard Terms & Conditions used between LBIE and other Lehman Brothers companies. (Instructed by Linklaters.)
  • Brightsea UK Ltd v Drachs Investments No.3 [2012] EWCA Civ 516; [2012] STC 1507 – Instructed by the successful appellant in appeal to the Court of Appeal concerning the extent of the vendor’s powers under a tax deed that formed part of a £200m company sale. (Instructed by Clifford Chance.)
  • Bradford & Bingley Valuation – Instructed by the Independent Valuer of Bradford & Bingley in relation to more than 700 references to the Upper Tribunal arising out of his valuation. The references were all dismissed following a hearing in May 2012. (Instructed by Linklaters.)
  • Abbey National & Others v OFT [2008] EWHC 2325, [2009] EWHC 36, [2009] EWCA 116, [2010] 1 AC 696 – The test case to establish whether the unarranged overdraft customers with the 67 million personal current account customers of the UK’s 8 major banks were challengeable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and/or under the common law penalty doctrine. (Instructed by Linklaters.)

David has considerable experience of professional negligence claims, particularly involving trustees, accountants, solicitors, company directors and valuers.

Recent Cases

  • Lemos v Coutts – Breach of trust claim brought against trustees of a Cayman based trust, concerning the trust’s investment in ships. The case involved a mixture of trust, professional negligence and loss quantification issues.
  • South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague [1997] AC 191 – Landmark decision in professional negligence and assessment of damages. (Instructed by Clifford Chance.)
  • Nykredit v Erdman [1997] 1 WLR 1627 – House of Lords decision on application of SAAMCO decision to questions of interest and limitation. (Instructed by Clifford Chance.)

David has considerable experience in disputes relating to partnerships and joint ventures.

Recent Cases

  • K v R – Dispute about issues of business valuation and legal argument about the effect of correspondence and meetings concerning proposed termination of the partnership. Settled shortly before trial in 2013. (Instructed by Harcus Sinclair.)
  • R v P – Dispute about partnership for operation of greyhound kennels. (Instructed by Goodman Derrick.)
  • K v B – Dispute about dissolution of solicitors’ partnership. (Instructed by Fox Williams.)
  • Re L – Appointed by the Bar Council to act as arbitrator on dispute about termination of a solicitors’ partnership.

Recent Cases

  • Lemos v CIBC – Claim against professional trustees in the Cayman Islands relating to the sale of shipping investments. (Instructed by Mourant.)
  • Lemos v Coutts – Claim against professional trustees in the Cayman Islands relating to the acquisition and retention of shipping investments. (Instructed by Maples & Calder and Linklaters.)
  • Trilogy Management Ltd v Cheung [2012] JCA 152 – Instructed (assisting Advocate Nicholas Journeaux) for the successful appellant to the Jersey Court of Appeal on a dispute as to the meaning of a provision in the Articles of Association of a company. (Instructed by Carey Olsen.)
  • Re Seymour Settlement [2002] – Called to the Isle of Man Bar and represented the claimant beneficiary in proceedings seeking the removal of a Protector on the grounds of conflict of interest.
  • Smith v Smith [2001] 1 WLR 1937 – Case about disputed disclaimer of interest under a will. (Instructed by Picton Smeathmans.)

Recent Cases

  • The RBS Rights Issue Litigation – Group litigation seeking damages arising out of RBS’s £12bn rights issue during the 2008 financial crisis.
  • Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) [2011] EWHC 2022 – Proceedings relating to the validity and effect of liens in Master Custody Agreements and Standard Terms & Conditions used between LBIE and other Lehman Brothers companies. (Instructed by Linklaters.)
  • Bradford & Bingley Valuation – Instructed by the Independent Valuer of Bradford & Bingley in relation to more than 700 references to the Upper Tribunal arising out of his valuation. The references were all dismissed following a hearing in May 2012. (Instructed by Linklaters.)
  • Credit Suisse v Ramot Plana [2010] EWHC 2759 – €12 million banking and commercial dispute relating to a property development in Bulgaria. (Instructed by Asserson Law Offices.)
  • Abbey National & Others v OFT [2008] EWHC 2325, [2009] EWHC 36, [2009] EWCA 116, [2010] 1 AC 696 – The test case (litigated all the way to the Supreme Court) established whether the unarranged overdraft customers with the 67 million personal current account customers of the UK’s 8 major banks were challengeable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 and/or under the common law penalty doctrine. (Instructed by Linklaters.)

Recent Cases

  • Pagden v Fry (including summary judgment / strike-out hearing at [2025] EWHC 1918 (Ch)) – Claim for damages against a private equity fund manager relating to the sale of a portfolio of companies.
  • Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) [2011] EWHC 2022 – Proceedings relating to the validity and effect of liens in Master Custody Agreements and Standard Terms & Conditions used between LBIE and other Lehman Brothers companies. (Instructed by Linklaters.)
  • Centenary Holdings III Ltd (in liquidation) v Vivendi SA & Others – £78m claim relating to allegedly unlawful financial assistance given upon sale of company. Includes claims against directors, advisors and parent company. Settled shortly before trial listed for January/February 2011. (Instructed by Lawrence Graham.)
  • Singer v Beckett (Re Continental Assurance of London Plc) [2007] 2 BCLC 287 – 72 day trial of £5m wrongful trading / misfeasance claim against directors of an insurance company. (Instructed by Goodman Derrick.)

David has considerable experience of charity matters, including acting for several years as one of the Treasury Solicitor’s panel counsel representing the Attorney-General, and more recently acting in two very substantial charity matters that are not in the public domain.

Recent Cases

  • Royal Merchant Navy School Foundation v Bearwood College Trustees – Acting for a well-known school in contentious charity proceedings relating to the terms of its separation from its founding charity. Settled in 2012. (Instructed by Stone King Sewell.)
  • Harwood v Harwood [2005] EWHC 3019 – Case about whether a gift of a collection for a museum gave rise to a valid charitable trust. (Instructed by HM Attorney-General.)
  • Manoogian v Sonsino (2002) W.T.L.R. 989 – Charity proceedings concerning the validity of a gift “for the purpose of the education and advancement in life of Armenian children”. (Instructed by HM Attorney-General.)

David has considerable experience in insolvency matters, particularly in cases involving banking or trust issues or claims against directors.

Recent Cases

  • Pagden v Fry (including summary judgment / strike-out hearing at [2025] EWHC 1918 (Ch)) – Claim for damages against a private equity fund manager relating to the sale of a portfolio of companies.
  • Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) [2011] EWHC 2022 – Proceedings relating to the validity and effect of liens in Master Custody Agreements and Standard Terms & Conditions used between LBIE and other Lehman Brothers companies. (Instructed by Linklaters.)
  • Centenary Holdings III Ltd (in liquidation) v Vivendi SA & Others – £78m claim relating to allegedly unlawful financial assistance given upon sale of company. Includes claims against directors, advisors and parent company. Settled shortly before trial listed for January / February 2011. (Instructed by Lawrence Graham.)
  • Singer v Beckett (Re Continental Assurance of London Plc) [2007] 2 BCLC 287 – 72 day trial of £5m wrongful trading/misfeasance claim against directors of an insurance company. (Instructed by Goodman Derrick.)

Recent Cases

  • The British Airways Data Breach Litigation – Group litigation arising out of the breach of security systems leading to the leaking of personal data of more than 400,000 BA customers – the first mass data breach claim to proceed as group litigation in the UK. (Instructed by Pogust Goodhead.)
  • The British Airways Data Breach Litigation – Group litigation arising out of the breach of security systems leading to the leaking of personal data of more than 400,000 BA customers – the first mass data breach claim to proceed as group litigation in the UK. (Instructed by Pogust Goodhead.)

David has experience in this field across a wide range of matters.

Testimonials


“David is immensely creative and clever.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“David is definitely the person to go to for a monstrous case. He is unflappable and dignified in the courtroom.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“David is just one of the cleverest guys on earth. He is methodical, well-reasoned and someone with exceptional brain power and court presence.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“David did one of the finest cross-examinations of an expert I've ever heard. He's very astute and forensically brilliant.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“Extremely able, highly technical and cerebral in his approach, David is the person to go to for a monstrous ce. Unflappable and dignified, he really holds the attention of the court.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“David is by far the most numerate barrister I've come across and speaks numbers as a second language. He deploys his experience in a strategic manner and brings everyone along with him.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“David excels as the architect of litigation strategy for the most complex of cases. He is unfailingly genial but demands always the highest standards of those he works with.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“Very sharp and at the forefront of using graph database technology to help advisors build well-reasoned conclusions supported by evidence and logic.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“Very cerebral, diligent and reflective.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“He is incredibly bright.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“David is really good on complex causes of actions and quantum. He also has an unparalleled ability to tackle issues in logical order and is good on strategy.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“David is very intelligent. He has the ability to get on top of hugely complex ideas and matters, and puts them in a straightforward and comprehensive way.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“David's written advocacy is particularly good.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“He is an incredibly smart individual, who wipes the floor with the other side's experts and presents his case with absolute clarity.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“David is an exceptional intellect and a pleasure to work with.”

Legal 500 2025

“David is decisive, persuasive and a strong team player. He comes up with practical and commercial solutions.”

Legal 500 2025

“He's a very bright chap, who produces good written work.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“David always provides an excellent service. He has the ability to make the complex seem simple by providing clear-cut advice across a range of complex issues.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“David Blayney has a massive brain and is very good fun to work with.”

Chambers & Partners 2024

“A very cerebral character who's an original thinker.”

Chambers & Partners 2023

“David always proves engaging and is on hand with each aspect of the instruction. His advocacy and insight are invaluable.”

Chambers & Partners 2023

“David has a mega brain, and has the ability to work across all the different areas that commercial disputes throw up. He is good at anything with a technical aspect.”

Chambers & Partners 2023

“He is studious, and adopts a calm and thoughtful approach. He is a clear and concise barrister.”

Chambers & Partners 2023

“A real thinker and a very imaginative lawyer.”

Chambers & Partners 2023

“He is an extremely nice man and a very clever, thoughtful and original thinker. He is very good and deals with the technical aspects of cases enormously impressively.”

Chambers & Partners 2020

“Quickly earns the confidence of clients. He's very approachable, easy to get on with and happy to make himself available at short notice.”

Chambers & Partners 2020

“He's very strong in technology and a very clever guy. He's also nice to work with.”

Chambers & Partners 2020

“He's formidably and inventively clever, and he's also nice to work with. One of the brightest at the Bar, he's a great team player and a deep thinker with an innovative approach.”

Chambers & Partners 2020

“His intellect has truly frightening firepower, but he wears it lightly and is incredibly easy to work with.”

Legal 500 2020

“Exceptional - the best recommendation I have had in 30 years of practice.”

Legal 500 2020

“He is a fearsome lawyer; his capacity both to absorb and process information and turn that into a winning strategy is phenomenal.”

Legal 500 2020

“A very smart silk.”

Legal 500 2020

“Impressive on professional negligence cases.”

Legal 500 2020

View all quotes

Latest


Recent Cases

Core VCT v Soho Square Capital & Others [2025] EWHC 1918 (Ch)

David Blayney KC and Sophie Holcombe acted for the successful defendants in a High Court decision clarifying the application of section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980.

Recent News

Artificial Intelligence in International Dispute Resolution: Build, Buy or Be Left Be

Serle Court is excited to partner with Keidan Harrison LLP to present “Artificial Intelligence in International Dispute Resolution: Build, Buy or Be Left Be” at LIDW 2026.

Serle Court at London International Disputes Week 2026

London International Disputes Week (LIDW) 2026 will return for a seventh year.

Serle Court achieves outstanding results in The Legal 500 UK Bar 2026

We are delighted to announce another year of outstanding rankings and testimonials in The Legal 500 UK Bar 2026.

AI in Action: How LLMs are revolutionising dispute resolution

Discover how AI is revolutionizing dispute resolution by enhancing efficiency and accuracy, while maintaining the crucial role of human expertise.

View all latest news

For general enquiries and instruction advice, please contact our Practice Management Team:

Call: +44 (0)20 7242 6105
or email: clerks@serlecourt.co.uk

Recommendations

  • Commercial Dispute Resolution, Chancery: Commercial, Group Litigation (Chambers & Partners)
  • Banking & Finance, Commercial Litigation, Company & Partnership, Private Client: Trusts & Probate, Professional Negligence (The Legal 500, 2019)

Memberships

  • Chancery Bar Association
  • Commercial Bar Association

Education & Qualifications

  • BA Law (First Class), Lincoln College, Oxford

BSB Registration

David James Blayney KC

VAT Number

649223135

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy (PDF)

LEADING SET:
UK Bar 2026

WINNER:
MENA Awards 2026 - English Bar in the Middle East: Commercial Set of the Year

WINNER:
Best Chambers for Work / Life Balance 2026

SHORTLISTED:
UK Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Chambers of the Year Award 2025

WINNER:
Bar Awards 2024 - Chancery Set of the Year

WINNER:
Middle East Awards 2024 - Middle East-Wide Dispute Resolution: Leading UK Barristers' Set

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Intellectual Property Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Commercial Litigation Set of the Year

Shortlist Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download    Add to shortlist   
Shortlist
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)