Jonathan Upton KC


Call: 2004 Silk: 2026

“He combines a sharp mind, deep knowledge, experience and seasoned advocacy with consummate client-handling skills.”

Chambers UK

Jonathan Upton KC’s practice involves a wide range of heavy commercial disputes, including litigation relating to commercial fraud and asset recovery. He has particular expertise in property related work but his practice also encompasses company and partnership disputes, problems involving trusts, banking and professional negligence claims.

Jonathan has considerable experience of asset recovery, including urgent interim relief (freezing injunctions, proprietary injunctions and asset disclosure orders). He has acted for interveners in a number of divorce cases, usually involving trusts and/or proprietary estoppel.

A substantial part of Jonathan’s work concerns real estate developments. His practice covers the full spectrum of disputes, from commercial disputes about joint ventures; fraud and dishonest conduct; failed securities and funding issues to more niche areas of property law.

Jonathan has been recognised in Chambers & Partners and the Legal 500 for many years. He was appointed Silk in 2026. 

Areas of Expertise

Jonathan’s practice includes the full spectrum of real property and commercial and residential landlord and tenant disputes.

He has significant experience in rights of light disputes and disturbances of other easements, acting for both developers and land owners, involving claims for injunctive relief and damages in lieu. His cases frequently involve expert evidence on negotiating damages based on a share of development profit. His recent work includes a claim for £1.9m arising out of the redevelopment of a prominent site in Shoreditch.

Jonathan advises and litigates on joint venture disputes and other matters relating to land including contracts for sale, overage, options, injunctions, specific performance, possession and orders for sale.

He is acknowledged as a leading practitioner in the field of restrictive covenants.

Recent Cases

  • Lees v Southern Electric Power Distribution Plc LC-2023-000412 – Acting for objector in relation to land adjoining an electricity substation.
  • Blackhorse Investments (Borough) Limited v Southwark LBC LC-2021-000445 – Application to set aside a final order modifying a restrictive covenant to permit conversion of a former public house into residential flats.
  • Martin v Lipton [2020] UKUT 8 (LC); [2020] PLSCS 7 – Successfully acted for an indemnity provider in a claim for modification of a restrictive covenant preventing development. The claim was fiercely opposed by all of the insured’s neighbours.

Jonathan’s extensive knowledge of the statutory protections in the residential landlord and tenant context make him the first choice counsel on matters affecting mixed-use developments. He advises and litigates on lease interpretation, tenants’ rights of first refusal, leasehold enfranchisement, right to manage, variation of leases and service charges. His cases frequently involve large group litigation.

  • Eastern Pyramid Group Corporation SA v Spire House RTM Company Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 1658; [2022] 1 W.L.R. 503; [2021] 11 WLUK 73; [2022] L. & T.R. 8; Times, January 17, 2021 – Right to Manage; withdrawal of claim notice; proper construction of s.86(2); consequences of failing to serve notice of withdrawal on qualifying tenants.
  • Chaun-Hui v K Group Holdings Inc [2021] EWCA Civ 403; [2021] 1 W.L.R. 5981; [2021] 3 WLUK 329; [2022] 1 P. & C.R. 14; [2021] L. & T.R. 12 – Whether payments under a management order are “service charges”; recovery of arrears owed to manager following termination of manager’s appointment.
  • Consensus Business Group (Ground Rents) Ltd v Palgrave Gardens Freehold Co [2020] EWHC 920 (Ch); [2020] 4 WLUK 236; [2020] 2 P. & C.R. 13; [2020] L. & T.R. 12 – Collective enfranchisement; Initial notices; Validity; Permission to amend; meaning of “self-contained building”.
  • Freehold Properties 250 Ltd v Field & Others [2020] EWHC 792 (Ch); [2020] Ch. 665; [2020] 3 W.L.R. 233; [2020] 4 WLUK 142; [2020] L. & T.R. 15 – Meaning of “tenant of a leasehold house” in s.1(1) of 1967 Act; no right to enfranchise an eggshell lease; whether parcels clause void under s.23(1). Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal was granted but the appeal was withdrawn.
  • CQN RTM Company Limited v Broad Quay North Block Freehold Limited [2018] UKUT 183 (LC); [2018] 7 WLUK 758; [2019] H.L.R. 9; [2018] L. & T.R. 26 – Right to Manage; meaning of “structurally detached”.
  • The Optic Freeholders Limited & Others v Francia Properties Limited [2018] 9 WLUK 451 – Tenants’ Rights of First Refusal; Enforcement of Purchase Notice 16 years after relevant disposal; validity of purchase notice; delay; whether planning permission a “change in circumstances.”
  • Francia Properties Ltd v Aristou & Ors [2017] L. & T.R. 5 – Whether roof development interferes with RTM company’s management functions – permission granted for leapfrog appeal to CA.
  • Saranovic v Saranovic [2017] Co-ownership; beneficial interests; s.1(2)(b) of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989; unjust enrichment; non est factum; order for sale.
  • Premium Jet AG v Sutton [2017] EWHC 186 (QB) Enforcement of Foreign Judgments; Final Charging Order; Beneficial Interests; Declaration of Trust; sham transactions; s.423 Insolvency Act 1986; transactions defrauding creditors.
  • Saunders v Al-Himaly [2017] EWHC 2219 (Ch) Joint venture; proprietary estoppel; unjust enrichment.
  • Tigris Industries Inc v Ghassemian [2016] EWCA Civ 269 Fraud; beneficial ownership; order for sale; second appeals; abuse of process.
  • Dass v Beggs [2014] EWHC 164 (Ch) Fraud; security for costs.
  • Ghassemian v Tigris Industries Inc [2013] EWHC 2170 (Ch); [2013] 7 WLUK Adverse possession; Charged property; Legal charges.
  • Chaudhary v Chaudhary [2013] EWCA Civ 758; [2013] 5 WLUK 25; [2013] 2 F.L.R. 1526; [2013] Fam. Law 1257 Beneficial interests; Resulting Trusts; Presumption of advancement.
  • Clearwater Properties Ltd, Re [2013] UKUT 210 (LC); [2013] 3 WLUK 767 Consent; Discharge; Restrictive covenants; User covenants.
  • Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson [2013] UKSC 14; [2013] 1 W.L.R. 854; [2013] 2 All E.R. 375; [2013] 3 WLUK 107; [2013] H.L.R. 21; [2013] 2 P. & C.R. 2; [2013] L. & T.R. 17; [2013] 2 E.G.L.R. 45; [2013] R.V.R. 164 Service charges; Consultation; Dispensation.

The majority of Jonathan’s cases include issues relating to contractual interpretation, very often in the context of development disputes. His practice includes business disputes between commercial parties and involves commercial fraud, enforcement of judgments and asset tracing.

He has significant experience of applying for urgent injunctive relief, including proprietary injunctions and freezing orders.

Jonathan particularly enjoys working as part of a team in large, complex litigation where he leads on property-related issues.

He accepts instructions in disputes (litigation and arbitration) in the British Virgin Islands, Jersey, Guernsey, the Dubai International Financial Centre and Bermuda.

Jonathan has extensive experience of cases involving fraudulent dispositions, sham transactions and allegations of dishonesty.

He is a seasoned trial advocate and has been involved in a number of cases involving the bona fides of a declaration of trust including; Tigris Industries Inc v Ghassemian [2016] EWCA Civ 269; Saranovic v Saranovic The Times, March 21, 2017; and Premium Jet AG v Sutton [2017] EWHC 186 (QB).

He is highly sought after in such cases for his forensic eye for detail and his prowess in cross-examination at trial.

Jonathan has acted as sole counsel on company matters including applications for restoration to the register, petitions under s.994 of the Companies Act 2006 and cases concerning directors’ duties. He is particularly experienced on matters relating to the management and administration of companies owned and controlled by leaseholders.

Jonathan’s trusts work encompasses co-ownership disputes and applications for orders for sale/TOLATA claims in both the domestic and commercial context. He successfully argued for a resulting trust analysis in Chaudhary v Chaudhary [2013] EWCA Civ 758; [2013] 2 F.L.R. 1526; [2013] Fam. Law 1257, cited in all the leading texts. He successfully appeared in the Upper Tribunal (Fancourt J) concerning the First-tier Tribunal’s jurisdiction to determine an application by joint trustees in bankruptcy to register a restriction against a property held in joint names (Wolloff and Dante (as Joint Trustees in Bankruptcy of Alexander James Dhillon) v Patel [2019] UKUT 333 (LC)).

Jonathan has acted for intervenors in a number of divorce cases, usually involving trusts and/or proprietary estoppel.

Jonathan has particular experience of cases involving fraudulent dispositions, sham transactions and allegations of dishonesty.

He is a seasoned trial advocate and has been involved in a number of cases involving the bona fides of a declaration of trust.

Recent Cases

  • Tigris Industries Inc v Ghassemian [2016] EWCA Civ 269
  • Saranovic v Saranovic The Times, March 21, 2017
  • Premium Jet AG v Sutton [2017] EWHC 186 (QB)

Jonathan acts in a range of professional negligence disputes, invariably involving solicitors, valuers, surveyors and other property professionals. His extensive knowledge of the underpinning substantive property law and/or valuation principles makes him a natural choice.

Recent work includes a claim against solicitors for failing to register a transaction in circumstances where the vendor subsequently re-sold the property to an innocent third party.

Jonathan has significant experience in banking and financial services disputes. He has acted in many high value cases about the enforcement of securities in regulated and unregulated lending. He is often instructed to advise and act in securities and receivership cases where enforcement is challenging.

Jonathan has considerable experience of partnership disputes, usually in the context of joint venture development agreements.

Recent Cases

  • Uthyavel v Raviraj [2021] EWHC 501 (Ch) – A 5-day trial regarding a complex partnership dispute about a business and properties in East London.

Jonathan frequently acts for large groups of investors and leaseholders.

Jonathan has also acted in many cases for local authorities in borough-wide applications for dispensation with the consultation requirements in relation to electricity contracts, insurance and major works. He has also acted for landlords in similar applications against large groups of leaseholders.

Recent Cases

  • Zaid Alothman Holdings Limited & 75 Others v Better Intelligent Management Limited [2024] UKUT 253 (LC) – Acting for a group of investors.
  • The Canary Riverside Litigation (e.g. Riverside Crem 3 Ltd v Unsdorfer [2022] UKUT 98 (LC)) – Acting for over 100 leaseholders in bitterly contested litigation against the Yianis Group.
  • Leaseholders of Phoenix Place v Better Intelligent Management – Acting act for a group of investors who own flats in a development comprising studio accommodation in Liverpool. There are parallel proceedings in the FTT and the Business and Property Courts.
  • Chaun-Hui v K Group Holdings Inc [2021] EWCA Civ 403; [2021] 1 W.L.R. 5981; [2021] 3 WLUK 329; [2022] 1 P. & C.R. 14; [2021] L. & T.R. 12 – Acting for a large group of leaseholders in a mansion block on Park Lane, Mayfair.
  • Fairman v (1) Cinnamon (Plantation Wharf) Limited (2) Plantation Wharf Management Limited Cube Real Estate Developments Limited [2018] UKUT 421 (LC) – Acting for as large group of leaseholders in a dispute about the landlord’s power to vary the apportionment of service charges.
  • The Optic Freeholders Limited & Others v Francia Properties Limited [2018] 9 WLUK 451 – Tenants’ Rights of First Refusal; Enforcement of Purchase Notice 16 years after relevant disposal; validity of purchase notice; delay; whether planning permission a “change in circumstances.”
  • Francia Properties Ltd v Aristou & Ors [2017] L. & T.R. 5 – Whether roof development interferes with RTM company’s management functions – permission granted for leapfrog appeal to CA.

Matthew has experience in this field across a wide range of matters.

Jonathan accepts instructions directly from members of the public under the Public Access scheme. He frequently acts for developers, landlords, management companies and individual leaseholders. In appropriate cases, he may also be able to accept direct access instructions from a large group of leaseholders.

Testimonials


“He is really clear in his advice, user-friendly and will end up being one of the next big names at the property bar.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“Jonathan is responsive, persuasive and commercial.”

Chambers & Partners 2026

“Jonathan has an excellent attention to detail and provides strategic advice.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“Jonathan is an absolute pleasure to work with. He is highly technically impressive and responsive. His advocacy skills are also excellent.”

Chambers & Partners 2025

“A silk in waiting. He has an unwavering ability to get to the commercial crux of a matter extremely quickly.”

Legal 500 2025

“Jonathan Upton is intelligent, reliable and pragmatic in his approach to dealing with matters.”

Chambers UK 2024

“Jonathan is easy to work with and has a very good understanding of the law.”

Chambers UK 2023

“He is just incredibly approachable and helpful. You can just pick up the phone and talk to him.”

Chambers UK 2023

“Jonathan is realistic, which is a valuable skill in commercial settings.”

Chambers UK 2023

“The perfect package for complex and hard-fought property litigation, Jonathan is both technically brilliant and a creative advocate.”

Legal 500 2023

“His written arguments are spot-on and convincing.”

Chambers UK 2022

“Jonathan is quietly confident and learned, a strong intellect and someone who has really established his own name as a leading practitioner in restrictive covenant and residential law.”

Legal 500 2022

“A good all-round property barrister with both residential and commercial expertise.”

Chambers UK 2021

“He combines a sharp mind, deep knowledge, experience and seasoned advocacy with consummate client-handling skills. Very cerebral, persuasive towards judges, prompt and easy to deal with.”

Chambers UK 2021

“A good choice for tricky cases, and someone who provides advice efficiently. He is both very commercial and good value for money.”

Chambers UK 2020

View all quotes

Latest


Recent Cases

Recent News

Better Intelligent Management Ltd v Phoenix Place Block A RTM Company Ltd & Anor [2026] UKUT 257 (LC)

Better Intelligent Management Ltd v Phoenix Place Block A RTM Company Ltd & Anor [2026] UKUT 257 (LC)

Jonathan Upton KC successfully represented the respondents as the Upper Tribunal upheld the leaseholders’ right to manage in the latest chapter of the long-running Phoenix litigation.

Jonathan Upton and James Weale appointed King’s Counsel

Members and Staff of Serle Court are proud to celebrate the appointment of Jonathan Upton and […]

High Court refuses urgent injunctive relief against NCAD

Jonathan Upton has successfully resisted an application for urgent injunctive relief against a no cause […]

Asset Recovery International 2026

Serle Court is pleased to sponsor Informa Connect's Annual Asset Recovery International Conference 2026, which will take […]

View all latest news

For general enquiries and instruction advice, please contact our Practice Management Team:

Call: +44 (0)20 7242 6105
or email: clerks@serlecourt.co.uk

Recommendations

  • Real Estate Litigation (Chambers UK)
  • Property Litigation (Legal 500)

Memberships

  • Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners
  • Chancery Bar Association
  • Property Bar Association
  • COMBAR

BSB Registration

Jonathan Michael Upton KC

VAT Number

941991983

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy (PDF)

LEADING SET:
UK Bar 2026

WINNER:
MENA Awards 2026 - English Bar in the Middle East: Commercial Set of the Year

WINNER:
Best Chambers for Work / Life Balance 2026

SHORTLISTED:
UK Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Chambers of the Year Award 2025

WINNER:
Bar Awards 2024 - Chancery Set of the Year

WINNER:
Middle East Awards 2024 - Middle East-Wide Dispute Resolution: Leading UK Barristers' Set

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Intellectual Property Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Commercial Litigation Set of the Year

Shortlist Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download    Add to shortlist   
Shortlist
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)