Thomas Elias


Call: 2008

“Thomas is a very strong advocate, capable of running and presenting difficult cases in a clear and persuasive manner.”

Legal 500

Thomas Elias is an experienced junior, recognised in the Legal 500 as a leading practitioner in company law, intellectual property, commercial litigation and insolvency. He regularly leads more junior counsel but is also happy to be led in more substantial cases.

In company law, Thomas has particular experience and expertise in bringing and defending unfair prejudice petitions. He appeared in one of the leading cases on derivative claims and regularly advises on claims involving breach of directors’ duties, Companies Act applications and aspects of corporate insolvency. He is one of the editors of Minority Shareholders: Law, Practice and Procedure (Joffe et al, 7th edn, 2024).

Thomas is regularly instructed in intellectual property and art cases, including claims involving trade marks, copyright, moral rights, design rights, confidential information and passing off. He is well-suited to litigation involving IP and wider commercial chancery claims where he is able to provide co-ordinated advice across several areas of law. Thomas is a contributing editor to CITMA’s Contentious Trade Mark Registry Proceedings (2nd edn, 2023).

Thomas’ commercial cases include major fraud claims (in one of which he successfully appealed a finding of dishonesty following a three-day hearing in the Court of Appeal), claims regarding the construction and rectification of commercial contracts, and arbitration. Thomas is also instructed on insolvency matters, particularly claims seeking or resisting the recovery of assets.

Areas of Expertise

Thomas has particular experience and expertise in bringing and defending unfair prejudice petitions. He appeared in one of the leading cases on derivative claims and regularly advises on claims involving breach of directors’ duties, Companies Act applications and aspects of corporate insolvency. Thomas is also instructed in LLP disputes. He is one of the editors of Minority Shareholders: Law, Practice and Procedure (Joffe et al, 7th edn, 2024).

Recent Cases

  • Re a company (2026) – Currently instructed to assist one of the Respondents to an unfair prejudice petition in Jersey. A four-week trial is listed in November 2026.
  • Work Work Ltd v Freeman (2026) – Currently instructed in a crossover company / commercial / IP claim involving claims for breach of directors’ duties, misuse of confidential information and breach of contract.
  • Noble House Ltd v Wittenberg (2026) – Acted for a majority shareholder in an application seeking a court ordered shareholders’ meeting under s. 306 CA 2006.
  • Re Ghaffari Fussell LLP (2026) – Acted in interim injunction application in a dispute regarding a solicitors’ firm. Included matters of construction of LLP agreement and practical and regulatory issues arising.
  • Peter Waddell Holdco. Ltd v Bluebell Cars (2025) – Instructed at various interim stages in this conjoined unfair prejudice petition and part 7 claim between the founder of Big Motoring World and a private equity company that invested in the business and subsequently removed him.
  • Griffiths v Griffiths (2025) – Two conjoined unfair prejudice petitions brought by one sibling against another alleging (inter alia) that the respondent had been secretly extracting money from the companies. Applications to strike out the petitions were heard in December 2022 before Deputy ICCJ Curl KC: [2023] EWHC 175 (Ch). Settled on day 1 of an 11-day trial in June 2025.
  • Uzor v Fordham (2025) – Acted for claimant shareholder in Mallet.Footwear Ltd bringing a derivative claim against the other shareholder, “Tommy Mallet”, a star of “The Only Way is Essex”. Obtained permission to continue the derivative claim, and obtained an interim injunction to enforce certain post-termination restrictive covenants: [2024] WEHC 966 (Ch). Settled in 2025.

Cases of more historic interest include:

  • Prince Abdulaziz v Apex Global Management [2014] UKSC 64, [2014] 1 W.L.R. 4495 – High-profile and wide-ranging litigation regarding unfair prejudice petitions. Appeared (with Daniel Lightman, now KC) for the successful respondents in the Supreme Court in October 2014.
  • Abouraya v Sigmund [2014] EWHC 277 (Ch); [2015] B.C.C. 503 – A claim to bring proceedings by way of double-derivative claim on behalf of a company against a director for breach of fiduciary and duty (with Daniel Lightman, now KC).
  • Re AMT Coffee Limited (2019-2020) – Instructed to act for the first respondent in a multi-party 11-day High Court trial of an unfair prejudice petition regarding a family-owned coffee company: [2019] EWHC 46 (Ch); [2020] 2 BCLC 50.

Thomas is regularly instructed in intellectual property and art cases, including claims involving trade marks, copyright, moral rights, design rights, confidential information and passing off. He is well-suited to litigation involving IP and wider commercial chancery claims where he is able to provide co-ordinated advice across several areas of law.

Thomas has acted in high profile disputes (such as the caterpillar cake dispute between “Colin” (M&S) and “Cuthbert” (Aldi)) and has considerable experience in disputes regarding “get up” or packaging of goods.

Thomas is a contributing editor to CITMA’s Contentious Trade Mark Registry Proceedings (2nd edn, 2023).

Recent Cases

  • Munday v Levine (2026) – Currently instructed by the artist, Chris Levine, defending a claim for infringement of moral rights in “Equanimity” and “Lightness of Being” – two well-known portraits of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Counterclaim for copyright infringement.
  • M L Technology Ltd & Anr v B.E.A.T. SAM (2026) – Currently instructed by the claimants in this High Court claim for copyright infringement, TM infringement and passing off in the context of a contractual dispute for the sale and purchase of company shares. A multi-jurisdictional claim with defendants in France, Monaco and Switzerland and related proceedings in Switzerland. At an interim hearing [2023] EWHC 1660 (Ch) successfully resisted the Dfs’ application for a stay and for security for costs, and obtained an unless order against the Dfs. A 5-day High Court trial took place in 2025.
  • Marks & Spencer plc v Aldi Stores Ltd (2024) – An appeal to the Court of Appeal in relation to registered designs in light-up, snow globe, gin liqueur bottles. Solely instructed a first instance in IPEC: trial judgment [2023] EWHC 178 (IPEC); [2023] FSR 17. Led by Michael Edenborough KC on appeal (but personally conducted part of the oral advocacy): [2024] EWCA Civ 178; [2024] ECDR 17; [2024] FSR 16.
  • Costa v DissociaDID Ltd [2022] EWHC 1934 (IPEC) – Instructed for the defendants / counterclaimants shortly before trial in a claim for copyright infringement in relation to scripts used in videos on the defendants’ YouTube channel promoting understanding of Dissociative Identity Disorder (previously called multiple personality disorder). Both claim and counterclaim succeeded in part. Counterclaim succeeded in respect of (the relatively unusual tort of) causing loss by unlawful means – the claimant had made and persisted in representations to YouTube that he knew to be untrue to persuade YouTube to “take down” certain of the defendants’ videos.
  • Marks & Spencer v Aldi Stores Ltd – “Colin the Caterpillar” (2021) – Instructed (with Michael Edenborough KC) on behalf of Aldi resisting claims that Aldi’s “Cuthbert” caterpillar cake infringed trade marks and other rights in M&S’s “Colin the Caterpillar” cake. Settled. One of the most publicly high-profile IP disputes of recent times.
  • The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & another t/a The United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra [2015] E.T.M.R. 40, [2015] EWHC 1772 (IPEC) – Acted for the defendants in a claim for passing off, trade mark infringement and infringement of copyright in dramatic works, and successfully invalidated the claimant’s Community trade mark. Received considerable press coverage because of the unusual nature of the dispute.
  • Moroccanoil Israel Ltd v Aldi Stores [2014] EWHC 1686 (IPEC) – Successfully defended Aldi in a passing-off action based on packaging “get-up” (with Michael Edenborough KC).
  • Harrison v Harrison [2010] FSR 25, 604 – One of few reported cases on the moral rights of derogatory treatment and false attribution.

Thomas is regularly instructed in cases with allegations of fraud or dishonesty across the broad range of chancery and commercial litigation.

Recent Cases

  • Borrelli v Otaibi (2026) – Currently instructed for one set of defendants in this major commercial court fraud claim, alleging the creation and promotion of fraudulent aviation investment notes. A 10-week trial is listed for Autumn 2027.
  • Alkoby v FDC Tech (2026) – Currently instructed in a claim arising out of a share purchase agreement for a foreign exchange brokerage based in Malta. Trial listed in December 2026.
  • Currently instructed in an arbitration (set down for early 2027) regarding alleged breaches of a contract to produce a technical device.
  • Jaffe v Greybull Capital LLP [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm) – Successfully acted for the Defendants in a 3-week Commercial Court trial resisting a claim in fraudulent misrepresentation arising out of the insolvency of Monarch Airlines. The Claimant was the administrator of Wirecard, the infamous German bank that collapsed in 2020 with a £1.9 billion hole in its balance sheet. The judgment (Cockerill J) contains an interesting discussion about the reliability of witness recollection. Led by John Wardell KC.
  • Lemos v Church Bay Trust Co & Ors [2023] EWHC 2384 (Ch) – Successfully acted for the defendants in an 8-day High Court trial resisting a claim to a property worth c. £8 million brought by a creditor and trustees in bankruptcy under s. 423 Insolvency Act (transactions defrauding creditors). The trial involved allegations of forgery of a key letter and cross examination on matters going back to the 1970s. Led Andrew Gurr.
  • Floreat Investment Management Limited v Churchill & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 440 – Acted for the successful appellants (leading John Eldridge) in a three-day appeal in the Court of Appeal relating to allegations of dishonesty and breaches of fiduciary duty relating to commissions taken on a loan. Achieved the unusual feat of overturning a finding of dishonesty at first instance. Instructed for the appeal only after the clients completely changed their legal representation following the decision at first instance.

Thomas acts for clients on the full range of insolvency issues. He started his insolvency practice with the usual range of bankruptcies and winding up hearings, but was also on a panel dealing with directors’ disqualification matters for the SoS. He has continued to act in a wide range of insolvency matters, particular asset-recovery claims and claims involving breaches of duty by directors.

Recent Cases

  • Bhatia v Purkiss (as liquidator of JD Group Ltd) – An involved dispute between the liquidator of JD Group Ltd and Mrs Bhatia involving several insolvency related proceedings, including a charging order; a Part 7 claim to rectify a TR1 to show that Mrs Bhatia is the sole beneficial owner of the property charged; an application for possession and sale; and a claim against Mrs Bhatia as a former director of JD Group under s. 212 IA 1986. Trial in 2025 rejected Mrs Bhatia’s claim for rectification: [2025] EWHC 349 (Ch).
  • Glenwood House Investments Ltd (In liquidation) – Acted for the principal creditor in the liquidation. Advised on and drafted s. 423 proceedings and a s. 212 claim against the former directors, including obtaining permission to serve out on directors resident out of the jurisdiction in Jersey.
  • Lemos v Church Bay Trust Co & Ors [2023] EWHC 2384 (Ch) – Instructed as leader at trial where he successfully acted for the defendants in an 8 day High Court trial resisting a claim to a property worth c. £8 million brought by a creditor and trustees in bankruptcy under s. 423 Insolvency Act (transactions defrauding creditors). The trial involved allegations of forgery of a key letter and cross examination on matters going back to the 1970s. The trial judgment deals with an unusual issue regarding the effect of serving a Notice to Prove and the requirements for making allegations of forgery in cross-examination.
    • Also acted in relation to a joinder application in 2021 [2021] EWHC 1173 (Ch), [2021] BPIR 830, a decision discussed in Muir Hunter on Personal Insolvency.
    • An (unusual) written judgment on costs budgeting by ICC Judge Jones [2023] EWHC 157 (Ch) is mentioned in Sealy and Milman on the Insolvency Legislation.
  • EI Realisations (2014) Limited (in liquidation) v Luger (2020) – Acted for claimant company in liquidation against one of its directors, a former England rugby player, for breach of duty. Turned on the liability of an inactive director for failing to take action to monitor the other director and prevent misconduct by that other director. Settled.
  • Alistair McCallum-Toppin in bankruptcy (2020) – Acted for the debtor in a bankruptcy petition following unfair prejudice proceedings. Issue of principle whether an order for an interim payment on account of a share purchase order (where the creditor retained the shares until full payment was made) was legally capable of founding a petition debt. (Instructed by Forsters LLP).
  • Tiberius Investments & Capital Limited v Viken Securities Inc BVIHC (COM) 57 OF 2012 – Appeared at a hearing in the BVI Commercial Court to set aside a Statutory Demand.

Thomas is regularly instructed in matters in The Bahamas, including two cases which reached the Privy Council. He is currently instructed to assist in an unfair prejudice petition in Jersey, and has acted in contentious disputes involving trusts in Jersey and Mauritius. Thomas was called to the bar of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in 2013 and has appeared in the BVI commercial court.

Recent Cases

  • Re a company (2026) – Currently instructed to assist one of the Respondents to an unfair prejudice petition in Jersey. A four-week trial is listed in November 2026.
  • Assisting Callenders & Co in The Bahamas in numerous claims arising out of and relating to the tax exemptions and other privileges conferred by the Hawksbill Creek Agreement (the document on which Freeport, Grand Bahama, was founded and developed), including assisting in a recent arbitration.
  • Ngumi v Attorney General of The Bahamas [2023] UKPC 12 – Acted as part of a team for the appellant in a claim for damages for unlawful detention. Succeeded in part. The Privy Council explained the proper construction of convoluted provisions in the Immigration Act of The Bahamas and set out the basis on which unlawful immigrants could be lawfully detained, and reviewed the principles on which damages should be awarded as compensation for lengthy periods of unlawful detention.
  • Responsible Development for Abaco v Christie & Ors [2023] UKPC 2, [2023] 4 WLR 47 – Acted as part of a team for the appellant company in an appeal against what it said were oppressive orders for security for costs. The Privy Council addressed the question of security for costs in the context of public interest environmental judicial review claims, including claims for security for costs by developers who had sought to be joined to the proceedings.
  • Monterrey v Fraser (2018) – Acted for a Mauritius trust company in a claim principally between joint venture partners and property developers. Trial was adjourned on day 1 due to the incapacity of one of the co-defendants. Settled before the substantive trial was re-listed.
  • Advice on copyright enforcement in Jersey and the Isle of Man in relation to sports broadcasts (2018).
  • Advice on an insurance dispute in the Turks and Caicos islands (instructed by Karam Missick) (2018).
  • Tiberius Investments & Capital Limited v Viken Securities Inc BVIHC (COM) 57 OF 2012 – Hearing in the BVI Commercial Court; an insolvency issue in the context of a multi-million dollar hedge fund dispute.

Testimonials


“Thomas is astonishingly clever. He also has terrific judgement and appears to command enormous respect from the judiciary.”

Legal 500 2025

“Thomas is astonishingly clever and has terrific judgement.”

Legal 500 2025

“Thomas is strong of mind and willing to make the difficult arguments in his client's best interests. He provides the advice that matters at an early stage, cuts through issues, and is a quick thinker on his feet.”

Legal 500 2025

“Thomas has a strikingly good eye for detail and his advocacy is perfectly judged, never overplaying a point but always pressing the point home until it lands.”

Legal 500 2024

“Thomas undergoes very thorough preparation, with a keen eye for detail and analysing the matter to find the best way to present the case. He is a strong advocate who is not intimidated by more senior opponents.”

Legal 500 2024

“Thomas radiates calm, and many a crisis passes unnoticed thanks to his grip on the situation.”

Legal 500 2024

“He is the perfect foil for a silk, who prefers to concentrate on the big picture, but is strategically very capable himself.”

Legal 500 2024

“He’s a real expert on company law. He’s very user-friendly, bright and pleasant to deal with.”

Legal 500 2023

“As a senior junior, Thomas is almost without peer as an advocate. He is thoroughly unflappable, and is talented at turning around a sceptical tribunal.”

Legal 500 2023

“Very bright, clear-thinking and tactically astute.”

Legal 500 2021

“His other areas of Chancery expertise add materially to the breadth and depth of the advice that he gives on IP issues.”

Legal 500 2021

“An excellent barrister with an eagle eye for the detail.”

Legal 500 2020

View all quotes

Latest


Recent Cases

GGF Fund v Anglian Windows and E Realisations 2020

The High Court in London has issued guidance on the distribution of the £4 million […]

Jaffé v Greybull Capital LLP [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm)

Jaffé v Greybull Capital LLP [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm)

Thomas Elias (instructed by Andrew Head, Bryan Shacklady and David Young of Forsters LLP and led […]

Marks and Spencer Plc v Aldi Stores Ltd, [2023] FSR 17

Marks and Spencer Plc v Aldi Stores Ltd, [2023] FSR 17

Thomas Elias acted for Aldi in this registered design case concerning the Christmas illuminated snow-globe […]

View all cases

Recent News

Serle Court Shortlisted for Six Awards at Legal 500 Bar Awards 2026

The number of nominations received this year is a testament to the outstanding work undertaken by everyone in Chambers.

Freeths x Serle Court | The IP Horizon: What’s new and what’s next?

Next week, on Wednesday, 27th November, Thomas Elias will be joining Freeths upcoming in-house lawyers […]

NLJ Book review: Minority Shareholders: Law, Practice & Procedure (7th Edition)

Six Serle Court barristers, Daniel Lightman KC, Tim Collingwood KC, Giles Richardson KC, David Drake, […]

Serle Court Company Conference 2024

We look forward to welcoming many of our friends, clients and colleagues to our upcoming Company […]

View all latest news

For general enquiries and instruction advice, please contact our Practice Management Team:

Call: +44 (0)20 7242 6105
or email: clerks@serlecourt.co.uk

Recommendations

  • Shortlisted for Legal 500 Bar Awards IP Junior of the Year 2026
  • Commercial Litigation (Legal 500)
  • Company & Partnership (Legal 500)
  • Insolvency (Legal 500)
  • Intellectual Property (Legal 500)

Publications

  • One of the editors of Minority Shareholders: Law, Practice and Procedure (Joffe et al, 7th edn, due February 2024)
  • Contributing editor of CITMA’s Contentious Trade Mark Registry Proceedings (2nd edn, 2023)

Memberships

  • Chancery Bar Association
  • COMBAR
  • IP Bar Association
  • Called to the Bar of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (BVI) (2013)

Education & Qualifications

  • BA (English)(Double first class honours); MPhil; PhD (16th century music and literature); all at King’s College, Cambridge
  • GDL (Distinction), City University
  • BVC (Outstanding – first in year), Inns of Court School of Law”

BSB Registration

Thomas Patrick Elias

VAT Number

978291171

Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy (PDF)

LEADING SET:
UK Bar 2026

WINNER:
MENA Awards 2026 - English Bar in the Middle East: Commercial Set of the Year

WINNER:
Best Chambers for Work / Life Balance 2026

SHORTLISTED:
UK Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Chambers of the Year Award 2025

WINNER:
Bar Awards 2024 - Chancery Set of the Year

WINNER:
Middle East Awards 2024 - Middle East-Wide Dispute Resolution: Leading UK Barristers' Set

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Intellectual Property Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Commercial Litigation Set of the Year

Shortlist Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download    Add to shortlist   
Shortlist
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)