Re Klimvest Plc: practical impact of new substratum winding-up decision explained
For litigators and corporate lawyers considering the impact on their clients of Re Klimvest Plc [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch), where the High Court granted a minority shareholder’s petition to wind up a listed plc on the ground of “loss of substratum” under section 122(1)(g) of the Insolvency Act 2006, Daniel Lightman QC and Max Marenbon have published a short analysis on LexisPSL. Their analysis covers the background to the case, the court’s reasoning and the practical implications for minority shareholders, company boards and those advising them.
Daniel Lightman QC and Max Marenbon represented the successful petitioner in Re Klimvest Plc [2022] EWHC 596 (Ch), instructed by Tamar Halevy of Marriott Harrison LLP.
To read their article, please click here.