#SerleShare: UniCredit: a more refined approach to determining the law which governs an arbitration agreement?

In his article for #SerleShare, Anthony Kennedy considers the Supreme Court's latest guidance on how to determine the law which governs an arbitration agreement in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC [2024] UKSC 30. 

Where two parties to a contract, governed by English law, have agreed that all disputes arising out of that contract shall be decided by way of arbitration in Paris, is an English court entitled to grant an anti-suit injunction to restrain one party from continuing (or indeed commencing) court proceedings? The Supreme Court, in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC,1 in agreement with the Court of Appeal,2 determined that the answer to the question was “yes”. The purpose of this note is to look at the Court’s reasoning and to consider what lessons commercial parties may learn from the judgment as a whole.

Related Barristers


Anthony Kennedy

Call: 2014

Related Expertise


Search




Subscribe for updates

LEADING SET:
UK Bar 2026

WINNER:
MENA Awards 2026 - English Bar in the Middle East: Commercial Set of the Year

WINNER:
Best Chambers for Work / Life Balance 2026

SHORTLISTED:
UK Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2025 - Chancery Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Chambers of the Year Award 2025

WINNER:
Bar Awards 2024 - Chancery Set of the Year

WINNER:
Middle East Awards 2024 - Middle East-Wide Dispute Resolution: Leading UK Barristers' Set

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Intellectual Property Set of the Year

SHORTLISTED:
Bar Awards 2024 - Commercial Litigation Set of the Year

Shortlist Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download    Add to shortlist   
Shortlist
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)